Re: lily in scheme : using music expressions

[David Brandon]

I'm a little bit worried about the architectural implications of this 
entire line of discussion.  I mean, lilypond syntax is already a bit of 
a frankenstein monster of mixed TeX and scheme.  I think encouraging 
too much embedded scheme is an approach which has the potential to make 
lilypond source files unreadable.  From a language point of view, by 
which I mean the lilypond language, I think it would be cleaner to have 
separate scheme extension modules which define new lilypond commands 
and are loaded via some kind of \import "module.scm" or some such.

Or am I just crazy?  Does everyone else think this is the right way to 
go?

David

--
David Brandon/address@hidden
The contents of David Brandon may not be suitable for all viewers.  
Viewer discretion is advised.