[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Double scripts and slurs
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Double scripts and slurs |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:43:57 -0700 |
On 3-Sep-04, at 12:12 PM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
address@hidden writes:
Judging from scm/script/scm, LilyPond appears to try to place the
accent underneath the slur. My recollection is that the accent (the
->
kind) goes above the slur. Comments?
Yes: please check in multiple reputable scores, and -if necessary-
apply changes to the script.scm file.
I think that this patch better reflects the way accents are placed.
May I
apply it?
RCS file: /cvsroot/lilypond/lilypond/scm/script.scm,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 script.scm
--- scm/script.scm 24 Aug 2004 22:17:20 -0000 1.22
+++ scm/script.scm 8 Sep 2004 16:43:16 -0000
@@ -10,10 +10,9 @@
((script-stencil . (feta . ("thumb" . "thumb")))
(direction . 1)))
("accent" .
- ((inside-slur . #t)
- (follow-into-staff . #t)
- (script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" . "sforzato")))
- (side-relative-direction . -1)))
+ ((script-stencil . (feta . ("sforzato" . "sforzato")))
+ (inside-slur . #f)
+ (side-relative-direction . -1)))
("marcato" .
((script-stencil . (feta . ("dmarcato" . "umarcato")))
(follow-into-staff . #t)