Re: state of building web (too many nodes, and missing examples)

[Graham Percival]

On 9-Sep-04, at 1:26 PM, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004, Graham Percival wrote:
> > (IMO we should have a
> > subsection under "polyphony", even if that's the only subsection in
> > that section),
>
> Why not moving "polyphony" behind 5.1.5 ("chords")?  Entering chords as
> described in 5.1.5 means entering multiple voices in a homophonic way,
> while polyphony means entering multiple voices in a polyphonic way.

IMO polyphony is sufficiently distinct from chords; I'd rather leave it 
as its
own section in the manual.  And right now I'm not looking at rearranging
the manual; that'll happen post-3.0

Right now I just want to be able to build the docs so I can get back to 
work.

Cheers,
- Graham