Re: Does "-f tex --tex" influence char selection?

[Juergen Reuter]

On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > 
> > > Seems ok here, also with -f tex --tex.
> > > 
> > 
> > That is, the result looks for you pretty much like the attachment that I 
> > sent?  That would be extremely strange, because in the manual on 
> > lilypond.org (as well as in my local repository here) it looks wrong; i.e. 
> > for both, you and me, running from command line seems to work while 
> > building the docu does not.
> 
> I might be mistaken, but I see ligatures and an ancient clef at
> 
>  
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/White-mensural-ligatures.html#White-mensural-ligatures
> 
> it could be that the previous update was before I cleaned the fonts,
> though.
> 
> I do get a longa printed through the 2nd ligature. Is that what you
> mean? 
> 

Exactly, that is what I am talking about.  It should be a short note head 
(much like a brevis), without cauda, just like in the attachment that I 
sent.

> I get that longa from the command line as well, both with -f tex and
> with direct PS.
> 

Ah, ok, thanks, that is what I wanted to know (though this sounds now even 
more confusing to me).  I guess I have to debug lily's TeX output to track 
down this bug.  This may take a while...

Thanks & greetings,
Jürgen