[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:52:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Nicolas Sceaux <address@hidden> writes:
> My mistake.
> pango 1.4.1 was the debian's one. I have 1.5.0 from (old) CVS. This is the
> one that was used to compile LilyPond with --enable-gui.
> I am upgrading to pango 1.5.2.
>
> What does BLOEDIGE_RAND mean? bleeding edge?
> Should I use pango, g-wrap, etc, from CVS/arch or the tar.gz packages?
>
Now, I have rebuilt and installed pango, g-wrap, guile-gnome:
nicolas:~> pkg-config --modversion pango
1.5.2
nicolas:~> pkg-config --modversion g-wrap-2.0-guile
1.9.1
nicolas:~> pkg-config --modversion guile-gnome-glib
2.5.993
and then built again LilyPond from CVS.
but still the same result.
Note: this may have nothing to do with gnome and pango, but I can
select LilyPond-feta in OOo Writer, and insert F-clef, dacoda signs,
etc.
nicolas
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, (continued)
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/09/19
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/09/19
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/20
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/09/20
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/20
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/09/23
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/24
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/09/24
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2004/09/25
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend, Nicolas Sceaux, 2004/09/25
- Re: 3.0 -- gnome backend,
Nicolas Sceaux <=
Re: 3.0, Erik Sandberg, 2004/09/19
Re: 3.0, Edward Sanford Sutton, III, 2004/09/21