[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: btw, articulation grouping
From: |
Giancarlo Niccolai |
Subject: |
Re: btw, articulation grouping |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Nov 2004 00:16:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
Alle 00:03, domenica 21 novembre 2004, hai scritto:
>
> It's generally easier to get started by implementing things in guile
> (scheme), rather than starting off playing with the parser.
Actually, I am quite fresh on parsers (just developed a language), however, I
sense you are right in the idea of "starting slow"; however, although I have
some basic knowledge of scheme, I suppose I can only hack around
copying&pasting other's code for a while, as I am rusty ATM with that
language.
Of course, as lilypond target are much more musichans than hard core hackers
(ya know, that bunch of guys programming in lisp/scheme all day ;-) I suppose
that as version number get higher, scheme slang will be progressively
replaced with musichan friendly commands, am I right?
If it's so, I agree making a scheme function to do that job.
>
> Hope this helps,
Yes; I'll try as soon as I can (uhm, quite busy the next few days, including
tomorrow, so it may be in a week or so).
Tnx.
Giancarlo Niccolai.