[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug] 2.5.2 breaks ancient notation
From: |
Juergen Reuter |
Subject: |
Re: [bug] 2.5.2 breaks ancient notation |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:06:46 +0100 (CET) |
What's the syntax of the s/u/d? Should it always be the first character
in the glyph name? In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:
fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")
(i.e. "s" as first character before duration),
but also:
fet_beginchar("Half Crossed notehead", "1scross", "halfcrossedhead")
(i.e. after the duration).
Similarly, in parmesan-heads.mf, after your change, I currently see:
fet_beginchar("Mensural maxima notehead", "-s3mensural", "mensuralmaximahead");
(i.e. "s" after "-"),
but also:
fet_beginchar("Mensural longa notehead", "s-2mensural", "mensurallongahead");
(i.e. "s" before "-").
So, what's the intended syntax?
Greetings,
Jürgen
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > > On Friday 26 November 2004 23.11, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
> > > > ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16.10.1
> > > > and
> > > > 5.16.11: some heads of the ligatures are missing. Maybe someone changed
> > > > something relevant in the parser?
> > >
> > > Did you rebuild your fonts? (try make clean;make or similar)
> > >
> >
> > I just looked at the documentation for 2.5.2 on the lilypond website.
> > Maybe Han-Wen did not rebuild the fonts. However, I am pretty sure he
> > did, because otherwise the neumes table in section 5.16.10.2 (Gregorian
> > square neumes ligatures) would also have been messed up; but the table
> > looks fine. Hence, I guess it's not a font problem, but rather a problem
> > of the engravers catching the right music events, which may be related to
> > some recent change in the parser (just a guess).
>
> The note heads were changed to include s (Symmetrical), u
> (upstem) and d (downstem) in the glyphname. Can you check if I forgot
> some of the ancient ones?
>
>
> --
>
> Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
>