lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [bug] 2.5.2 breaks ancient notation


From: Juergen Reuter
Subject: Re: [bug] 2.5.2 breaks ancient notation
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 14:06:46 +0100 (CET)

What's the syntax of the s/u/d?  Should it always be the first character 
in the glyph name?  In feta-bolletjes.mf, I see:

fet_beginchar("Whole Crossed notehead", "s0cross", "wholecrossedhead")

(i.e. "s" as first character before duration),

but also:

fet_beginchar("Half Crossed notehead", "1scross", "halfcrossedhead")

(i.e. after the duration).



Similarly, in parmesan-heads.mf, after your change, I currently see:

fet_beginchar("Mensural maxima notehead", "-s3mensural", "mensuralmaximahead");

(i.e. "s" after "-"),

but also:

fet_beginchar("Mensural longa notehead", "s-2mensural", "mensurallongahead");

(i.e. "s" before "-").



So, what's the intended syntax?

Greetings,
Jürgen



On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:

> address@hidden writes:
> > 
> > 
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> > 
> > > On Friday 26 November 2004 23.11, Juergen Reuter wrote:
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > Hmmh, it seems something changed between 2.5.1 and 2.5.2 such that
> > > > ligatures are (once again) broken, see e.g. manual, sections 5.16.10.1 
> > > > and
> > > > 5.16.11: some heads of the ligatures are missing.  Maybe someone changed
> > > > something relevant in the parser?
> > > 
> > > Did you rebuild your fonts? (try make clean;make or similar)
> > > 
> > 
> > I just looked at the documentation for 2.5.2 on the lilypond website.  
> > Maybe Han-Wen did not rebuild the fonts.  However, I am pretty sure he 
> > did, because otherwise the neumes table in section 5.16.10.2 (Gregorian 
> > square neumes ligatures) would also have been messed up; but the table 
> > looks fine.  Hence, I guess it's not a font problem, but rather a problem 
> > of the engravers catching the right music events, which may be related to 
> > some recent change in the parser (just a guess).
> 
> The note heads were changed to include s (Symmetrical), u
> (upstem) and d (downstem) in the glyphname. Can you check if I  forgot
> some of the ancient ones?
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]