Re: Some code for polygons

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

David Feuer writes:

> The easiest way to keep this working the same as it does now is to
> name my new functions filled-polygon and retain the old (really
> simple) polygon drawers in the backends.

Hmm.  I'd much rather just have a simple dedicated white-triangle
function, if we must.

> The polygon procedure in lookup.cc can still go away.

Ok.

> I'm a bit curious, though, why the triangles are done that way, which
> lets the blot exceed the normal bounds.  If that behavior is a bug,

Yes, I guess so.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org