Re: page breaking documentation

[Joe Neeman]

On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 08:10 +0200, Erik Sandberg wrote:
> On Thursday 07 September 2006 02:25, Joe Neeman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 15:08 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> > > Joe Neeman wrote:
> > > By "the absence of notes", do you mean "{r | R | s} in all parts", or do
> > > you mean "{s} in all parts" ?  That "does not scan for rests" is a bit
> > > confusing.  If you mean the first option, I suggest
> > >
> > > +sections without notes (either @code{r} or @code{R} rests or
> > > address@hidden skips.
> >
> > I mean "{r | R | s} in all contexts that the engraver is looking at".
> 
> You mean {r | R | s | \skip}, right? (\skip doesn't generate anything, so it 
> is a strong form of "absence of notes")

Yes. The engraver only listens for note-heads, so anything that causes
time to pass without creating note-heads might allow a page turn.