[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another skyline problem
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: another skyline problem |
Date: |
Tue, 05 Dec 2006 14:56:08 +0100 (CET) |
> > symbol up -- this is the right action. However, if you comment
> > out the line overriding the Y-offset property you can see that it
> > has no effect, which is problematic.
>
> If a user wants the symbol to be moved from its default position,
> they can set extra-offset instead of Y-offset.
Then it no longer takes place in the formatting.
> If a user wants the symbol to be positioned at an absolute offset
> from its Y-parent, they can just set outside-staff-position to () in
> addition to setting Y-offset.
Unfortunately, I can't `just set outside-staff-position' because this
property doesn't exist yet -- at least I wasn't able to find it.
However, this is the missing info -- as soon as the skyline stuff gets
documented (and implemented :-) properly, this very feature should be
described also.
Werner
- another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/05
- Message not available
- Fwd: another skyline problem, Joe Neeman, 2006/12/05
- Re: another skyline problem,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: another skyline problem, Joe Neeman, 2006/12/05
- Re: another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Joe Neeman, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Joe Neeman, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/07
- Re: another skyline problem, Werner LEMBERG, 2006/12/08
- Re: another skyline problem, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2006/12/07