[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: charge of lilypond
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: charge of lilypond |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:33:53 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212) |
Francisco Vila escreveu:
> El sáb, 24 de feb de 2007, a las 10:27:51 +0100, laurent-ducos dijo:
>> We noticed by using lilypond that the invocation of lilypond is so
>> greedy in resource processor. They is a little tedious for the use of
>> lilypond in cgi at the time of connection multiples. Does Y have to you
>> it a means of calling upon lilypond in a more sparing mode? Is the speed
>> of execution of lilypond it a criterion of development? Thank you
>
> I propose (at least in windows) to leave a part of the program
> resident so that invocation are less painful. Office and OpenOffice do
> this and Lily needs this as well, I think.
The best way to do this, is to write a scheme extension that
reads file names from a socket or a pipe, processes those.
Then you can save on the startup time of LilyPond.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen