Re: lilypond's layout has become worse

[Han-Wen Nienhuys]

2007/3/8, Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
> Uh, oh, I leave it to you to play with the C++ code.  I was rather
> thinking of
>
>   (define-public EMPTY (+inf.0 -inf.0))
>
> in lily-library.scm.  I can't imagine that we really need `inf' for
> the user.


I think you can't type "inf" in Scheme.

> BTW, why are `START' and `STOP' defined with `define-safe-public'?
> It's not really clear to me which objects need the safe versions...

--safe works by limiting  the scope of # expressions.  If an object is
not defined as safe, it will not be visible inside # when running
--safe.

> > Also, the
>
> Hmm.  The sentence looks unfinished...

yes, but I forgot what I wanted to say :-)


--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen