[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again)
From: |
Nicolas Sceaux |
Subject: |
Re: Build failure with Scheme (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Apr 2008 11:49:04 +0200 |
Le 26 avr. 08 à 04:28, Han-Wen Nienhuys a écrit :
It would be cool if we could define the markups like
(define-markup-command (bla layout properties width arg) (number?
markup?)
((line-thickness 0.0)
(corner-radius 0.2))
..
)
where this defines that the bla command uses line-thickness and
corner-radius, and automatically extracts them from properties. We
could then annotate the bla command automatically.
Nicolas, what do you think?
Sorry, I didn't follow that thread. The aim is to automatically extract
the properties a markup command is using, for the documentation, right?
Then we could restrict this syntax change to builtin commands. Anyway,
implementing this should not be a problem. I can have a look at it.
(0.0 and 0.2 would be default values, in case the property are not
already defined?)
nicolas
- Build failure with Scheme (again), John Mandereau, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/22
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Mats Bengtsson, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2008/04/25
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again),
Nicolas Sceaux <=
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Graham Percival, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Nicolas Sceaux, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Valentin Villenave, 2008/04/26
- Re: Build failure with Scheme (again), Graham Percival, 2008/04/26
- RE: Build failure with Scheme (again), Carl D. Sorensen, 2008/04/26