[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position
|
From: |
Risto Vääräniemi |
|
Subject: |
Re: (patch proposition) note-by-number augmentation dot position |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 May 2008 16:07:39 +0300 |
2008/5/20 Joe Neeman :
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Risto Vääräniemi wrote:
>> I tried to create the special case for 16th notes only. 8th notes and
>> notes from 32th forward (until 64th note) would use a common placement
>> rule. This is because the 16th note flags hang "lower" than the
>> others. Hopefully the attached image clarifies what I mean.
>
> That does clarify it, thanks. I'll get this committed sometime soon.
Grreat! Thanks in advance.
-Risto