Re: Renaming \setTextCresc, \setHairpinCresc, etc.

[Patrick McCarty]

On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Trevor Daniels <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I think is this too complicated.  For crescendos there are just
> two possibilities - cresc. or hairpins - and for decrescendos
> there are four - decresc., decr., dim or hairpin.  That is, six
> altogether, so why do we need eight commands?
>
> Based on Graham's proposal I would suggest the following
> as logical and clear:
>
> \crescAsCresc
> \crescAsHairpin
>
> and
> \dimAsDecresc
> \dimAsDecr
> \dimAsDim
> \dimAsHairpin

Hi Trevor,

I really like this idea.  I knew there was a more logical way to
organize these commands.

>  If there is an objection to "Hairpin" perhaps "Graphic" would
> do?

IMO, "Hairpin" is better than "Graphic".

-Patrick