Re: finished second draft?

[Mats Bengtsson]

Graham Percival wrote:
> > I would propose to still introduce the <<{...} \\ {...} >> feature 
> > first, but with some bells
> > and whistles saying that you might get problems together with lyrics
> > and automatic beaming
> > and telling where to look at that time.
> >     
>
> In the LM, definitely.  In the NR, these warnings might be more
> prominent, and/or Carl's suggestion about delaying << {} \\ {}>>
> until later in the chapter might be good -- especially in NR 3.
>   
Definitely! I was talking about the LM. For the NR it can make more 
sense to
describe the general case first and the shortcuts afterwards.

  /Mats