[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status of manuals
From: |
Carl D. Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Status of manuals |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:13:06 -0600 |
On 9/12/08 2:10 PM, "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Hawryluk Friday, September 12, 2008 9:02 PM
>
>
>> I'd be up for some reviewing. I'm still new enough at LilyPond that
>> I'd learn a lot from some 'assigned readings' and I could probably
>> tell if they make sense to someone that doesn't compile their own
>> LilyPond binaries over breakfast.
>
> OK, that's good. NR 1.5 Simultaneous is the first
> section not yet reviewed. AFAIK you don't have
> access to git? That's not a problem, but you will
> need to pull the source files from Savannah. Do
> you know how to do this? If not, ask me off list
> and I'll give you directions.
Why does a reviewer need to pull source files from git? Can't (shouldn't)
the reviewer do the final review on the docs themselves?
Carl
- Re: Status of manuals, (continued)
- Re: Status of manuals, Valentin Villenave, 2008/09/10
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/10
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/10
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals,
Carl D. Sorensen <=
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Patrick McCarty, 2008/09/12
- Re: Status of manuals, Andrew Hawryluk, 2008/09/12
Re: Status of manuals, Trevor Daniels, 2008/09/12