[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Are tick barlines too thin?
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Are tick barlines too thin? |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:48:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-9-generic; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2008 22:13:57 schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> Neil Puttock wrote Wednesday, December 24, 2008 3:36 PM
>
> > Should tick barlines be the same thickness as nornal barlines?
> > Currently they get their width from line-thickness which makes them
> > slightly lighter; it also makes it impossible to tweak their
> > appearance without altering the look of the whole stave.
>
> Definitely. We don't want different overrides for the different styles
> of barline.
I first tried using the barline width for the tick, but then the ticks looked
strange and unlike the ticked barlines that I have seen in e.g. transcribed
psalms. since in those scores the tick appeared to be the same width as the
staff lines, I decided to use that width instead of the barline width...
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* LilyPond, Music typesetting, http://www.lilypond.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFJUspATqjEwhXvPN0RApNyAJ9bYqa0dgaFOj62vU7gBm8t8vlbvgCeN81V
R+IDowcuy8KT64evevf6Sho=
=8QfZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----