Re: Learning Manual TOC missing subsubsubsections

[Trevor Daniels]

Carl D. Sorensen wrote Friday, January 02, 2009 7:56 PM

> I'd be in favor of a policy that says the equivalent of the following:
>
> "Each chapter has a defined section structure.
>
> The structure consists of chapter, section, and subsection.
>
> If subsubsections are desired, they should be unnumbered, and all
> subsections in the chapter should include subsubsections.
>
> All substantive information in the chapter should be at the lowest section
> level."

Perfect!  I'll subscribe to that.

> IMO, if one part of chapter needs more headings than other parts, there's
> probably a potential for reorganization.

Yes; this is a good indicator.

> Also, as I've looked more into it, I may want to recommend that NR 5 and 
> NR
> 6 be combined (but I'm not sure yet).

No, they should remain separate.  Tweaks in NR 5 should not require
any Scheme programming; those in NR 6 clearly do.  Since Scheme
programming will be a watershed for many users this is a valuable
distinction which should be maintained.

Trevor