[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mergin web/ with master/
From: |
Francisco Vila |
Subject: |
Re: mergin web/ with master/ |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:33:41 +0200 |
2009/6/5 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> Do we need a separate branch (or even repository) for web/ stuff?
> I propose that we merge this with the main branch.
That's a bit surprising because IIRC it has been told to separate it
completely into another place.
> CON:
> - adds 30 megs to the main branch (including the .git dir)
Disk usage is already 1Gb for it on my machine. 30Mb more is not too much.
> - makes translations harder? (maybe? ... I don't know if this is
> true, but IMO this is the only real reason to avoid doing this)
I think not, because the check-translation scripts are run from
different directories. I could be wrong.
> If we agree with this proposal, then we'll be left with:
> lilypond repo
BTW don't try to merge lilypond/translation into master until I'll
bake a megapatch that solves a conflict of hundredths of files worth
(really!)
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
- mergin web/ with master/, Graham Percival, 2009/06/05
- Re: mergin web/ with master/,
Francisco Vila <=
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/06/05
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, John Mandereau, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: mergin web/ with master/, John Mandereau, 2009/06/07