[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: development on windows
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: development on windows |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:06:53 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>
>>> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
>>> downloaded .exe".
>>
>> GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
>> builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
>> names.
>>
> Agreed. We should call binaries by Lily dev team "GUB binaries" or
> whatever you like that sounds correct, but not just
> GUB, which is the building framework.
Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary". It was a play on
the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly
Cheers,
- Graham
Re: development on windows, Paul Scott, 2009/06/06
Re: development on windows, Trevor Daniels, 2009/06/06
- Re: development on windows, Graham Percival, 2009/06/06
- Re: development on windows, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/06
- Re: development on windows, John Mandereau, 2009/06/06
- Re: development on windows,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: development on windows, Patrick McCarty, 2009/06/07
- Re: development on windows, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/07
- Re: development on windows, Trevor Daniels, 2009/06/07
- Re: development on windows, Graham Percival, 2009/06/09
- Re: development on windows, Francisco Vila, 2009/06/07
- Re: development on windows, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/06/07
Re: development on windows, Trevor Daniels, 2009/06/06
Re: development on windows, Bertalan Fodor, 2009/06/13
Re: development on windows, Bertalan Fodor, 2009/06/14