Re: development on windows

[Patrick McCarty]

On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Graham Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 01:23:22AM +0200, John Mandereau wrote:
>> Francisco Vila a écrit :
>>> 2009/6/6 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>>> Err... by "run GUB", I mean "generate sheet music using the
>>>> downloaded .exe".
>>>
>>> GUB is the builder, and it builds the released binaries. You run the
>>> builder or the released binary. I propose to call things by their
>>> names.
>>>
>> Agreed. We should call binaries by Lily dev team "GUB binaries" or
>> whatever you like that sounds correct, but not just
>> GUB, which is the building framework.
>
> Err... "GUB" stands for "Grand Unified Binary".  It was a play on
> the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) of physics.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/cgi-bin/namazu.cgi?query=GUB&submit=Search!&idxname=lilypond-devel&max=10&result=normal&sort=date%3Aearly

Interesting.  So did the name evolve over time?  Now it appears to be
called the Grand Unified Builder:

http://lilypond.org/gub/

-Patrick