[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:42:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 01:20:00AM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote:
> Am 09.10.2009 um 21:37 schrieb Graham Percival:
>> On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 09:10:20PM +0200, Christian Hitz wrote:
>> Interesting. What happens if you try 2.12.3 ? That was created
>> with current GUB, but (obviously) 2.12 code.
>>
>> If that succeeds, then we know[1] that the problem is in the main
>> source code; if that fails, then we know[1] that the problem is in
>> GUB.
>
> I tested both 2.12.2 and 2.12.3 on darwin-x86 10.5 and 10.6.
>
> 2.12.2 works on both platforms, 2.12.3 hangs on creating the fonts cache
> on both systems. It works if 2.12.2 has created the cache before.
Interesting! I suspect that Patrick hasn't been clearing out the
font cache before testing each version. I wonder how far back the
problem goes?
As far as I know, neither Jan nor I have handy access to an OSX
box any more. So we're kind-of relying on other people to send
patches.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, (continued)
Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, James E. Bailey, 2009/10/09
Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/09
Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Christian Hitz, 2009/10/09
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Graham Percival, 2009/10/09
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Christian Hitz, 2009/10/09
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, James E. Bailey, 2009/10/09
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/10
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Graham Percival, 2009/10/10
- Re: testing 2.13.6 darwin, mingw, Patrick McCarty, 2009/10/10