[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: top posting
From: |
Johannes Schindelin |
Subject: |
Re: top posting |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:55:24 +0100 (CET) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
Hi,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
[do not know who said that, Bertalan removed that information]
> > I think you don't understand what top posting means: It means that you
> > quote the whole message (and all messages that it quoted) and simply
> > add your reply at the top. This way, each mail contains the whole
> > history!
>
> I wanted to say that I prefer that to quote the whole message and simply
> add your reply at the bottom.
That is not top-posting.
But frankly, please do not discourage anyone from top-posting. This would
deprive me of a valuable indicator to sort my emails. I get 200+ emails a
day, some of which do not even land in my inbox (some people are culled by
my killfile, I think there is even one on this list), and I have to have a
way to sort out those who are clueful enough that I should spend (the time
I have to answer mails) on them. Top-posting is a _perfect_ way to lable
those who are not in that group. I just cannot read every mail I get.
Please, do not deprive me of that indicator.
Ciao,
Dscho
- Scheme Engraver - Removing Engravers, Eric Knapp, 2010/01/28
- Re: Scheme Engraver - Removing Engravers, Carl Sorensen, 2010/01/28
- Re: Scheme Engraver - Removing Engravers, Eric Knapp, 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool), 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting, David Kastrup, 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting,
Johannes Schindelin <=
- Re: top posting, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2010/01/29
- Re: top posting, David Kastrup, 2010/01/29