[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nasty header positioning issues
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: nasty header positioning issues |
Date: |
Sat, 01 May 2010 18:05:36 +0200 (CEST) |
>> I wonder whether this should be added to the documentation...
>
> Please, please, don't ever wonder about this. If anybody finds
> anything in the archives that might possibly be useful: add it to
> LSR. Don't stop to wonder. Don't think. Do not pass go. Just add
> it to LSR.
Adding to the LSR is always useful, but in this case you've missed my
point (and I wasn't clear enough): The original problem is a bug, and
Kieren's solution essentially circumvents it in a nifty way. So my
question is basically whether we shall document his workaround, thus
making it sacrosanct...
Werner
- nasty header positioning issues, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Neil Puttock, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Graham Percival, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Graham Percival, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Kieren MacMillan, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Neil Puttock, 2010/05/01
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/04
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: nasty header positioning issues, Werner LEMBERG, 2010/05/04