[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures
From: |
Boris Shingarov |
Subject: |
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures |
Date: |
Mon, 03 May 2010 09:12:56 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Webmail 5.0 |
On Mon, 03 May 2010 09:02:55 0200, David Kastrup wrote:
"Boris Shingarov" <address@hidden> writes:
> Markup functions being able to return a list of stencils.
>
> Markup lists don't do the trick here?
No; if you look at patch 207105, you'll see what I mean.
I don't see that you stand a chance with the standard processes here.
[...]
> Basically you'll be on your own going against the tide until you are
> finished. The work flows here are designed to achieve code quality by
> making it harder for a would-be contributor to get sub-par code through,
> not by making others participate with the work.
I guess even that assessment is overly optimistic.
The real problem here is not of process, but of fundamental
interests. I am scratching *my* itch, which is, make
top-publication-grade work possible with Lilypond. Lilypond did not
reach this grade before. So this work is beneficial to the Lilypond
community in two ways: proving we can go on that territory, as well as
purely technical contributions. Now, with technical contributions
that are easy enough to integrate back upstream, ok I can spend the
extra 30% effort to integrate; but 500% does not seem justifiable and
then we take the GPL as the guideline: here is the new code, enjoy
doing whatever you please with it. But I am open to any suggestion
how to make it more useful to the community.
Boris
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures, Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/03
Re: markup-command and markup-command-list signatures,
Boris Shingarov <=