[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041) |
Date: |
Wed, 5 May 2010 19:01:30 +0100 |
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:57 AM, <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think it's an improvement. I've made specific comments inline.
sweet mao... you're adding barline checks to every single example?!
cis4 ees fisis, aeses |
I definitely do **not** like this.
cis4 ees fisis, aeses
is just fine to read. If there's only one bar of simple music on a
line, surely we don't need a barline check!
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/05/03
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/05/04
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2010/05/05
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041),
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/05
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Graham Percival, 2010/05/05
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Carl Sorensen, 2010/05/05
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Mark Polesky, 2010/05/06
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), Graham Percival, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), tdanielsmusic, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/07