[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041)
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041) |
Date: |
Fri, 7 May 2010 21:46:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 01:31:35PM -0700, Mark Polesky wrote:
> Graham Percival wrote:
> > http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041/diff/33001/27003#newcode2481
> > Documentation/learning/fundamental.itely:2481: <<
> > There is *still* an indentation mistake here. This is the
> > third time I've pointed it out -- do we disagree on the
> > "two-space indents" rule?
>
> Graham,
>
> have you not been getting my comment replies?
Apparently not!
> I've explained this twice now:
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041/diff/1/3#newcode2537
> http://codereview.appspot.com/1056041/diff/24001/25002#newcode2481
Huh. Yes, that makes perfect sense...
... oh, I see the problem now. I can't (or at least, a year ago I
couldn't) use my google apps account for codereview, so I made a
throwaway gmail account for that, but never set up forwarding. I
see your replies on that account.
Sorry about this.
- Graham
- Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), (continued)
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), tdanielsmusic, 2010/05/06
Re: Doc: LM: Reformat ly code. (issue1056041), percival . music . ca, 2010/05/07