Re: Doc: NR removed @knownissue for X-staff tremelos

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 11:19 AM, James Lowe <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mark Polesky wrote:
>>
>> Did you guys not see Neil's reply?
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-05/msg00008.html
>>
>> Cross-staff unstemmed tremolos (note the spelling)
>
>> ... look terrible:

 \new PianoStaff <<
 \new Staff = "up" \relative c' {
    s1
  }
  \new Staff = "down" \relative c'' {
    \voiceOne
    \repeat tremolo 16 {
      <a e'>32
      {
        \change Staff = "up"
        \voiceTwo
        <cis a'>32
      }
    }
  }


Well, if somebody submitted this bug now, I wouldn't add it as a
@knownissue; I'd just expect it to be added as Defect-medium or
Defect-High.  Patrick, could you check if we have such an issue
(potentially at a different priority) ?


> From my own perspective 'look terrible' is rather subjective and do they
>  *always* look terrible in all cases or just in the simple example below?
>
> I am happy to put this @knownissue back but '...does not work well' wasn't
> really appropriate or useful to anyone when in fact the example above looked
> pretty OK to me.

I won't object if anybody wants to put the @knownissues back there
(potentially with a different wording), but I think for consistency
with (most) other problems in lilypond, dumping it in the tracker is
best.

Cheers,
- Graham