[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: attachment points for vertical spacing dimensions
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: attachment points for vertical spacing dimensions |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:55:59 -0600 |
Mark Polesky:
>> Personally, I think we should add a new variable to
>> control the spacing between a markup and the bottom
>> margin. We could call it bottom-markup-spacing for now,
>> but see this post for my proposed variable renaming:
Joe Neeman:
>
> This is easy enough to add (and the naming seems fine to
> me).
Mark:
>Carl, are you opposed to bottom-markup-spacing (or
>"markup-bottom-spacing" in the new naming system) for any>
>reason?
I think I'd just prefer a single variable last-item-bottom-spacing that
would apply to the last item, whether it's a system or a markup. I think
having two separate variables complicates the issue. But I don't feel
strongly about this, and I could be easily swayed by a counter-argument.
Thanks,
Carl
- Re: attachment points for vertical spacing dimensions,
Carl Sorensen <=