Re: attachment points for vertical spacing dimensions

[Graham Percival]

On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 08:50:20AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> 
> Further to my suggestion to leave the renaming to GLISS,
> so far there have been only comments supporting the
> renaming, even from Joe.  Since no discussion seems
> to be necessary, do you think it might be better to
> change the names before 2.14?  That way users would
> only have to understand one change in the stable
> releases rather than two.

I don't quite understand that final sentence, but I agree with the
rest -- especially since GLISS (1) will almost certainly not be
discussing property names.  Since we're changing the vertical
spacing for 2.14 anyway, let's change the spacing names as well.

Cheers,
- Graham