[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilymidi and lilysong
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: lilymidi and lilysong |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:50:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 02:44:13PM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > They don't seem to be installed as part of the -x86 tarball, at
> > least. Now, you might wonder about abc2ly, and certainly etf2ly
> > and mup2ly, but I don't see any lilysong or lilymidi.
>
> Are you referring to our GUB shar? I do get
> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilysong and lilymidi with the tarball;
Yeah, but you don't get
/usr/local/bin/lilysong
> and both Fedora and Debian packages (haven't checked others) do
> install /usr/bin/lilysong and -midi.
That's their problem.
> Neil: sorry, I have searched the -devel archives but not -user :-)
> However, if these do work (which I'm glad they do btw!), then it would
> be nice to have them mentioned somewhere in the docs...
What, you mean like issue 1245?
Cheers,
- Graham