[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a new pitch representation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a new pitch representation |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:43:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:
> If we are going to move to a list for alterations, the list should probably
> be rationals, rather than integers, in order to be most general. Thus it
> should most likely be (1/2 -1/4), rather than (1 -1).
In that case, it would appear that "alteration" as a separate concept
could be eliminated, and instead of pitch x with alteration (y z ...),
we could just write (x y z ...).
It is just a pity that x is not (logarithmically) equispaced in physical
pitch.
--
David Kastrup
- Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, David Kastrup, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30