[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Towards a new pitch representation
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: Towards a new pitch representation |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:46:21 -0700 |
On 12/31/10 10:28 AM, "Felipe Gonçalves Assis" <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Ok, Carl,
>
> You vote for a list of integers, with arbitrary length.
I'm not sure I vote, yet. I'm still in discussion mode.
I *do* vote for either a number or a list, so that the current behavior can
continue.
I *do* vote for a list, rather than a pair, for the alterations, because
that allows extension to arbitrary levels of alterations.
I *think* I vote for separating the scale degree from the alterations. The
approach of including degree and alterations in a combined list has
mathematical elegance, most musicians will think in terms of scale degree
with alterations (e.g. d flat is scale degree d with an alteration of flat).
I think the current interface is good from the user point of view.
Thanks,
Carl
P.S. I'm so impressed that you came along *making* the change, instead of
asking somebody else to make the change for you. That's a great
contribution!
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, (continued)
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, David Kastrup, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31
- Re: Towards a new pitch representation,
Carl Sorensen <=
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/30
Re: Towards a new pitch representation, Felipe Gonçalves Assis, 2010/12/31