[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
use of @I{} in documentation
From: |
Carl Sorensen |
Subject: |
use of @I{} in documentation |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:03:39 -0700 |
Hi all,
I was looking through Documentation/notation/rhythms.itely in order to fix
the beaming issue that Mats identified.
While doing so, I noticed that there were several places in that section
that used @i{} in order to set something in italics. In one place, it was
notation, so it should have been @notation{}. In another place, it was a
subheading, so it should have been @emph{}.
But when I looked in the CG, I could find no reference of @notation{} or
@emph{} in the syntax summary.
In my opinion, we should never use direct formatting commands such as @i{}
in the text. We want logical descriptors, rather than formatting
descriptors.
Does anybody else agree with me? Is this a discussion to postpone to GLISS?
I certainly wouldn't postpone 2.14 for it.
Thanks,
Carl
- use of @I{} in documentation,
Carl Sorensen <=