[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of @I{} in documentation
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: use of @I{} in documentation |
|
Date: |
Sat, 12 Feb 2011 18:40:36 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:03:39PM -0700, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> But when I looked in the CG, I could find no reference of @notation{} or
> @emph{} in the syntax summary.
Yes, they should be added.
> In my opinion, we should never use direct formatting commands such as @i{}
> in the text. We want logical descriptors, rather than formatting
> descriptors.
Yes. Make it so.
> Does anybody else agree with me? Is this a discussion to postpone to GLISS?
> I certainly wouldn't postpone 2.14 for it.
No need to postpone to GLISS (or GOP) -- this has been our policy
all along. Just do it now, or ask somebody else (Trevor? James?)
to do it.
Cheers,
- Graham