Re: Adds stem acknowledgement to beam collision engraver to fix issue 795. (issue4337045)

[address@hidden]

On Apr 6, 2011, at 4:19 AM, Trevor Daniels wrote:

> 
> address@hidden wrote Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:35 PM
> 
> 
>> I'd like to get this pushed in the next 24 hours if possible (which will
>> require 2 LGTMs).  This way, << { c'8 [ s c' ] } \\ { s c''8 s }  >> will
>> be prettier.
> 
> Here's one.  LGTM.
> 
> It certainly improves the revised regtest, but
> I don't see any change in the example above.
> Should I?
> 
> Trevor

Sorry, I meant << { c'8 [ s c' ] } \\ { s \stemUp a'8 s }  >>

One more LGTM & issue 795 can be retired. Alternatively, if you think I 
shouldn't push, lemme know!

I've tweaked the patch slightly after my most recent push (added one line to 
define-grobs.scm to account for the stem-interface), so if you want to run the 
regtesets, make sure to work from that most recent version.

Cheers,
MS