RE: developers on Windows [7]

[James Lowe]

Hello,

)-----Original Message-----
)From: address@hidden
)[mailto:address@hidden On
)Behalf Of James Lowe
)Sent: 27 May 2011 14:29
)To: eluze; address@hidden; Phil Holmes
)Subject: RE: developers on Windows [7]
)Importance: Low
)
)Eluze,
)
))-----Original Message-----
))From: address@hidden
))[mailto:address@hidden
)On )Behalf Of eluze
))Sent: 27 May 2011 13:37
))To: address@hidden; Phil Holmes
))Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7]
))
))Am 27.05.2011, 14:20 Uhr, schrieb Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
))
))> ----- Original Message ----- From: "-Eluze" <address@hidden> )> To:
)<address@hidden> )> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 12:49 PM )>
)Subject: Re: developers on Windows [7] )> )> )>> )>> )>> Jan
)Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
))>>>
))>>>
))>>> I could use some help from a developer who can do some testing on
))>>> Windows 7 (64 bit?) SP1.
))>>>
))>>> See this bug:
))>>>
))>>>    http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1562
))>>>
))>>> I'm trying to get this one nailed, and am getting a lot of help, but
))>>> it's still very clumsy for a Windows noob like me, without access to
))>>> such a problematic machine.
))>>>
))>> i just had the opportunity to run this program on a machine with )>>
)windows 7 starter (32-bit) - tried both 2.13.53 and 2.13.61 and had )>> no
)error at all.
))>>
))>> hope this information is of use.
))>>
))>> cheers Eluze
))>
))>
))> Have you installed SP1?
))>
))> --
))> Phil Holmes
))>
))>
)
)[James' reply:] can you try to compile the *exact* example in the tracker
)item (assuming you haven't done that)?
)
)If it still works it might be some quirk of Windows Starter Edition. I have
)access to the other versions but not this one - this is OEM by the looks of
)it.

[James' reply:] 
Hmm...I do have access to this version of Windows (Starter edition). So Eluze 
if you can let me know if the example compiles on your system I'll also test 
with this too.

James