[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue454705
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058) |
Date: |
Tue, 31 May 2011 07:59:11 +0100 |
On May 28, 2011, at 2:28 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Do we need to change the definition of stem-attachment in
> scm/define-grobs.scm to be ,boolean-or-number-pair? (and maybe define a
> new ,boolean-or-number-pair predicate)?
>
To my knowledge, #f can be used for all properties. So I'd say that it's OK to
use #f here.
> Do we need to make any changes to ly/note-head-scheme.cc?
>
Nope.
> Do we need to check for #f in ly/note-collision.cc?
>
Yup (fixed in new patch).
> I just did a git grep stem-attachment and saw these places where
> stem-attachment was used.
Thanks!
Graham, could you include this in your next countdown?
Cheers,
MS
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/05/22
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), mtsolo, 2011/05/28
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), Carl . D . Sorensen, 2011/05/28
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058),
address@hidden <=
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), percival . music . ca, 2011/05/31
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), mtsolo, 2011/05/31
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), n . puttock, 2011/05/31
- Re: Allows LilyPond to ignore certain note-heads in a stem. (issue4547058), mtsolo, 2011/05/31