Re: Issue 1724 -> 620 : workaround?

[address@hidden]

On Jul 20, 2011, at 4:26 PM, Neil Puttock wrote:

> On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround
>> I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached
>> to #1724 ?
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724
> 
> Let me think about it for a bit.  I have an idea using a scheme
> engraver which might work.
> 
>> PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the
>> consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to
>> understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue.
> 
> You're welcome to add snippets to it rather than relying on the links
> to the merged issues (we could also mention the Dynamics context in
> the issue title).
> 
> Cheers,
> Neil
> 

I ran into the exact same thing in a score I'm working on and proposed a patch 
to devel - lemme know what ya'll think!

Cheers,
MS