Re: music function semantics

[Jan Warchoł]

2011/7/29 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
> Jan Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
>> if i understood you correctly (it's about the difference in syntax
>> between tweak and override?), i agree that it's quite a serious
>> problem.
>
> There is not all that much, really.  Take a look at music-functions.scm,
> for example style-note-heads.  It's sort of polymorphic since it can be
> called in various places.  It looks at the type of received music
> expression in order to figure out where it was called, and does a tweak
> or an override depending on what will work in that context.

I see...
The more i think about it, the more i feel it would be good to merge
\set, \override and \tweak into one thingy.  Doing so would make music
functions like above one quite simpler.
GLISS - i can't wait for you!

cheers,
Janek