[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: music function semantics
From: |
Jan Warchoł |
Subject: |
Re: music function semantics |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Jul 2011 17:31:10 +0200 |
2011/7/29 James Lowe <address@hidden>:
>
> 29 July 2011 08:11 Jan Warchol wrote:
> )...ah, so it is possible to modify ties in a chord separately! Do you
> realize
> )that i didn't know about it?
>
> Snippet for LSR?
I tried to write it, and do you know what? It doesn't work! Very stupid.
% if you apply this tweak to first note (c'), it works (tie gets
weird). However, when applied to second note, it doesn't.
{ < c' ~ g'-\tweak #'control-points #'((1 . -1) (3 . 0.6) (12.5 .
0.6) (14.5 . -1)) ~ > q }
- Re: music function semantics, (continued)
- Re: music function semantics, Jan Warchoł, 2011/07/30
- RE: music function semantics, James Lowe, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Carl Sorensen, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Carl Sorensen, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Jan Warchoł, 2011/07/31
- Re: music function semantics, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/31
- Re: music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/31
- Re: music function semantics, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/31
- RE: music function semantics, James Lowe, 2011/07/29
- Re: music function semantics,
Jan Warchoł <=
- Re: music function semantics, David Kastrup, 2011/07/30
- RE: music function semantics, James Lowe, 2011/07/30
- Re: music function semantics, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2011/07/30
- RE: music function semantics, James Lowe, 2011/07/30