Re: GOP-PROP 5: build system output (probable 3)

[Carl Sorensen]

On 7/30/11 5:34 PM, "Graham Percival" <address@hidden> wrote:

> We have somebody willing to work on this stuff.  He's twiddling
> his thumbs until we get the basic guidelines down.  Of course
> there will be technical implementation problems to work out later,
> but I'm really hoping that he can start work; it's been a month!
> 
> Are there any problems with those guidelines?  If you disagree
> with a point (or if I have not convinced you that you should
> accept the proposal), please speak up.  If you would like to add a
> point, please speak up.
> 
> http://lilypond.org/~graham/gop/gop_5.html
> 
> 

LGTM.

If we get this infrastructure in place, we can later look at appropriate
logging levels (as in Reinhold's new patch) to be added to the build tree.

But I can see no reason not to start on the behavior described in GOP-PROP
5.

Thanks,


Carl