[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.15.8 Regtests
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: 2.15.8 Regtests |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Aug 2011 01:30:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Keith OHara <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>> >
>> > Unless somebody objects, I will remove 'nested-property-revert.ly' from
>> > the test suite; The test code still exists in the open issue 1063.
>>
>> I'd like to keep this test as I am working on the full functionality.
>> It will likely get extended in the end to cover more cases, but it is
>> useful as a start already.
>
> Thanks, David.
>
> Since you are keeping a copy, and there is a copy on 1063, I will remove it
> from input/regression right away.
>
> Don't forget to make an extra copy before you next rebase the branch on which
> you are working on 1063; you will probably need to `git add` it back to that
> branch.
Looks like we associate differing meanings with one or several of the
words "unless", "somebody" or "objects".
--
David Kastrup
- 2.15.8 Regtests, Phil Holmes, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, David Kastrup, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/06
- Re: 2.15.8 Regtests, Graham Percival, 2011/08/07