Re: Broken beams' slopes

[David Kastrup]

Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:

> I wonder if this solution would yield good results: keep beam slope
> before and after break identical (except for some beam quanting,
> perhaps, but that's less than 0.3 ss), but modify stem lengths: make
> them as long as they would be if there were no beam on the other side
> of the break.

I would expect this to yield mostly reasonably results.  I'd also keep
beam orientation.  But it might make sense to dole out a bit of spring
force (just decidedly less than infinite) for making the vertical beam
positions at the break match.

-- 
David Kastrup