[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.15.9 regtests
From: |
Mike Solomon |
Subject: |
Re: 2.15.9 regtests |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Aug 2011 18:33:03 +0200 |
On Aug 30, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Phil Holmes wrote:
> Well - there are too many differences on the official page for me to count.
> It was clearly going to be iffy when I looked at the "items still to load" in
> the browser and it was over 1100. In my pixel comparator, I've got 1,031
> difference files to check.
>
> There are 2 obvious causes of this: one is the slight clef change; the other
> is a slight spacing change - it looks like, as a general rule, 2.15.9 is
> slightly more compact on ragged-right versus 2.15.7 (which is my local
> baseline).
>
> I'll attach one difference file which I don't understand - is this the effect
> of the change in spacing to the time sig?
>
> Not sure how we can take this forward? In principle I guess we could
> temporarily revert the clef change and try to find what caused the spacing
> change, and then do a specific release with just those. Or we could take
> shifts in checking images. Or we could keep our fingers crossed.
git bisect tells me that this comes from:
commit cc88cd368096843ec42d001fe96eca038d1bd3be
Author: Keith OHara <address@hidden>
Date: Sat Aug 20 22:15:52 2011 -0700
Fixed spacing in space-alist; issue 1785
The 'fixed' distance was intended to limit compressibility.
Cheers,
MS
- 2.15.9 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2011/08/30
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/30
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests,
Mike Solomon <=
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/30
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Graham Percival, 2011/08/31
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Mike Solomon, 2011/08/31
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Trevor Daniels, 2011/08/31
- Re: 2.15.9 regtests, Keith OHara, 2011/08/31