[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few remarks concerning \relative
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: A few remarks concerning \relative |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:23:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:54:11AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> * The pitch of the first note is relative to `STARTPITCH'.
> `STARTPITCH' is specified in absolute octave mode, and it is
> recommended that it be a octave of `c'.
>
> Why c?
Because C is the default "base note" in western classical music.
I have no clue why we didn't call A major the key with no sharps
or flats, but that's the legacy we're left with. Most people
think of octaves happening from C to C.
> (in Documentation/notation/input.itely). You get g', a, b, d, do', re'
> (an I am not talking about translations here!). But the idea of taking
> f' seems to be not taken. Pity: I consider it clever.
Ah, but clever solutions are a bad idea! ;)
> Then we also have:
>
> If no `STARTPITCH' is specified for `\relative', then `c'' is
> assumed. However, this is a deprecated option and may disappear in
> future versions, so its use is discouraged.
>
> Note that if that syntax is discontinued, then \relative can be
> implemented as a music function.
Well, I've been wanting to get rid of it for years. I was only
waiting for GLISS.
Cheers,
- Graham
- A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Graham Percival, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Janek WarchoĊ, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11