[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A few remarks concerning \relative
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: A few remarks concerning \relative |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:39:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> 2011/9/11 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>
>> Let me suggest
>> <URL:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.general/66503>
>> as one data point supporting my contention that \relative f and its
>> relatives might be worth mentioning in the manual.
>>
>> "\relative f
>> will use whatever note starts that group as the \relative note
>> (think about it!)."
>
> Magnificent! I didn't realize what you were saying at the beginning,
> but now i see and i'm stunned!
It is more likely that you only saw what I was saying at the beginning,
but now you realized what I was actually thinking.
The quoted sentence is definitely and quite embarrassingly utter
rubbish.
"\relative f will interpret whatever note starts that group as if it
were specified as an absolute pitch." would be what I meant. The
"\relative note", of course, is nothing but f if you specify "\relative
f".
> A "ransparent" relative! It's definately worth mentioning in the
> docs. As for the original question - whether we should encourage
> \relative f* instead of \relative c* - i'm not sure. \relative f is
> indeed very smart and perhaps more fool-proof (i admit making mistakes
> with \relative c' - mainly when i want pitch b or b' to appear). It's
> only drawback is that it requires some thinking at the beginning; i'm
> not opposed to thinking, but Lily is already very hard for beginners
> :(
It requires thinking if you have not yet come across it. If the
documentation (tutorial _and_ notation) mentions it prominently, it
should be idiomatic enough. I would have considered it a better default
for \relative { ... } as well, but that's water down the old drawbridge.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, (continued)
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Graham Percival, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Graham Percival, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Janek Warchoł, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Trevor Daniels, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/11
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Benkő Pál, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Benkő Pál, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Benkő Pál, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, Graham Percival, 2011/09/12
- Re: A few remarks concerning \relative, David Kastrup, 2011/09/12