[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:11:08 +0200 |
On Sep 23, 2011, at 6:38 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Phil Holmes <email <at> philholmes.net> writes:
>>
>> There are 2 significant problems I've found with 2.15.12. The first is
>> shown in the Les Nereides regtest - a fingering indication goes missing.
>>
> Confirming. The missing fingering indication is hidden under a note head
> in the other voice. The change from Stem to Flag for 2.15.12 is necessary
> to see the problem. I'll try to reduce to a minimal example but it will
> take a while; there are lots of interacting overrides in that torture-test.
>
I just compiled the file and I see the fingering indications just fine - I
don't think any of the indications are hidden under noteheads (I could be
reading the regtest file wrong, however).
>> The second is performance. On longer scores, 2.15.12 is _much_ slower.
> Confirming. On average compilation takes 1.5 times as long as it did with
> 2.14.2, so not as bad as your factor of 2.
>
This could be the Flag or Stem work...I'll try to dig deeper over the next
couple days.
Cheers,
MS
- 2.15.12 regtest problems, Phil Holmes, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/22
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems,
address@hidden <=
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Graham Percival, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, Keith OHara, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, address@hidden, 2011/09/23
- Re: 2.15.12 regtest problems, David Kastrup, 2011/09/23