Re: do we want special versions of the accidentals for use with text?

[Janek Warchoł]

Reinhold, Werner,

2011/9/28 Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> Am Mittwoch, 28. September 2011, 16:05:51 schrieb Janek Warchoł:
>> I'm not sure i understand - are you saying that we should always align
>> accidentals like in attached 'blah.png'?  I.e. chordnames with
>> accidentals should look like 'chords 2.png'?
>
> Basically, yes. The image just shows that the baseline for the sharp needs to
> be adjusted ;-)

2011/9/28 Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>:
>
>> I'm not sure i understand - are you saying that we should always
>> align accidentals like in attached 'blah.png'?
>
> Yes, but in this image, the baseline for the sharp is far too high
> (this is, the accidental is positioned too low) and both accidentals
> are slightly too big.

I'm slightly confused now - sorry :-(
For clarity, could you send images showing how the output of

\markup { \sharp \flat "blah"  }
\chords { fis es }

should look like in your opinion?

thanks,
Janek